There are 130
official ways for an infant to die. These official
categories of death, sanctioned by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), are published
in the
International Classification of Diseases (ICD).[1-3] When a baby dies, coroners must choose from among these 130 categories.
The
official causes of death listed in the ICD include nearly every
imaginable -- and tragic -- possibility. However, there is NO category
for infant deaths caused by vaccines.[4] This is odd because the federal
government is aware that vaccines permanently disable and kill some
babies -- the very reason Congress established a "death and disability"
tax on childhood vaccines more than 25 years ago when the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-660) created the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).
Many parents
don't realize that when they purchase vaccines for their babies, the
cost is taxed and the money goes into a special fund to compensate them
if and when those vaccines seriously injure or kill their babies. As of
November 1, 2013, more than $2.5 billion was granted for thousands of
injuries and deaths caused by vaccines. Numerous cases are still
pending. Awards were issued for permanent injuries such as learning
disabilities, seizure disorders, mental retardation, paralysis, and
numerous deaths, including many that were initially misclassified as
sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).[5]
Since vaccine-related
deaths
are officially recognized by the federal government but there is NO
official classification for vaccine-related deaths in the ICD, two
important questions must be asked:
1) Are some deaths that are listed within the 130 infant mortality
death categories really deaths that are associated with vaccination?
2) Are some vaccine-related deaths hidden within the death tables?
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)Prior
to the introduction of organized vaccination programs, 'crib death' was
so rare that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics. In
the United States, national immunization campaigns were initiated in the
1960s when several new vaccines were introduced and promoted. For the
first time in history, most U.S.
infants
were required to receive several doses of DPT (diphtheria, pertussis,
tetanus), polio, and measles vaccines.[6] By 1969, an alarming epidemic
of sudden unexplained infant deaths impelled researchers to create a new
medical term -- sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).[7]
By 1972, SIDS had become the leading cause of post-neonatal mortality
(deaths of infants from 28 days to one year old) in the United
States.[8] In 1973, the National Center for Health Statistics, operated
by the CDC, created a new cause-of-death category to document deaths due
to SIDS.[9,10]
SIDS is defined as the sudden and unexpected
death of an infant which remains unexplained after a thorough
investigation, including performance of an autopsy and review of the
clinical history.[11] Although there are no specific symptoms associated
with SIDS, an autopsy often reveals congestion and edema of the lungs
and inflammatory changes in the respiratory system.[9,12]
In 1984, Congress held a hearing on vaccine safety. The suspected link between
vaccines
and sudden infant deaths was addressed. The following excerpt is from a
statement made by a distraught grandmother testifying before the
Congressional Committee on Labor and Human Resources:
"My name is
Donna Gary. I am a constituent of Senator Kennedy's from Massachusetts.
Our family should have celebrated our very first granddaughter's first
birthday last month. Instead, we will commemorate the anniversary of her
death at the end of this month.
"Our granddaughter, Lee Ann, was
just 8 weeks old when her mother took her to the doctor for her routine
checkup. That included, of course, her first DPT inoculation and oral
polio
vaccine. In
all her entire 8 weeks of life this lovable, extremely alert baby had
never produced such a blood-curdling scream as she did at the moment the
shot was given. Neither had her mother ever before seen her back arch
as it did while she screamed. She was inconsolable. Even her daddy could
not understand Lee Ann's uncharacteristic screaming and crying.
"Four hours later, Lee Ann was dead. 'Crib death,' the doctor said -- 'SIDS.'
'Could it be connected to the shot?' her parents implored.
'No.'
'But she just had her first DPT shot this afternoon. Could there possibly be any connection to it?'
'No, no connection at all,' the emergency room doctor said definitely.
"My
husband and I hurried to the hospital the following morning after Lee
Ann's death to talk with the pathologist before the autopsy. We wanted
to make sure he was alerted to her DPT inoculation such a short time
before her death -- just in case there was something else he could look
for to make the connection. He was unavailable to talk with us. We
waited two-and-a-half hours. Finally, we got to talk to another doctor
after the autopsy had been completed. He said it was SIDS.
"In
the months before Lee Ann was born, I regularly checked with a friend as
to the state of her grandchild's condition. He is nearly a
year-and-a-half older than Lee Ann. On his first DPT shot he passed out
cold for 15 minutes, right in the pediatrician's office.
"'Normal
reaction for some children,' the pediatrician reassured. The parents
were scared, but they knew what a fine doctor they had. They trusted his
judgment. When it was time for the second shot, they asked 'Are you
sure it's alright? Is it really necessary?' Their pediatrician again
reassured them. He told them how awful it was to experience, as he had,
one of his infant patient's bout with whooping cough. That baby had
died. They gave him his second DPT shot that day. He became
brain-damaged.
"This past week I had an opportunity to read
through printed copies of the hearings of this committee. I am dismayed
to learn that this same talk has been going on for years, and nothing
has seemed to progress to incorporate what seems so obvious and
necessary to keep from destroying any more babies, and to compensate
financially those who have already been damaged for life. How accurate
are our statistics on adverse reactions to vaccines when parents have
been told, are still being told, 'No connection to the shot, no
connection at all.'?
"What about the mother I have recently
talked with who has a 4-year-old brain-damaged son? On all three of his
DPT shots he had a convulsion in the presence of the pediatrician. 'No
connection,' the pediatrician assured.
"I talked with a father in
a town adjoining ours whose son died at the age of 9 weeks, several
months before our own granddaughter's death. It was the day after his
DPT inoculation. 'SIDS' is the statement on the death certificate.
"Are
the statistics that the medical world loves to quote to say, 'There is
no connection,' really accurate, or are they based on poor diagnoses,
poor record keeping? What is being done to provide a safer vaccine? Who
is overseeing? Will it be the same scientists and doctors who have been
overseeing in the past? How much longer does the public have to wait?
How are physicians and clinics going to be held accountable to see that
parents are informed of the possible reactions? And how are those
children who should not receive the vaccine to be identified before they
are damaged -- or dead?
"Today is the National Day of Prayer. My
prayer is that this committee be instrumental in doing what needs to be
done -- and soon. May there not be yet another year pass by with more
children afflicted, and some dead, because those who can do so refuse to
make the right connection."[13]
Back to SleepThroughout
the 1980s, sudden infant deaths continued to skyrocket. Parental
concerns about an apparent link between childhood vaccines and SIDS
reached a fever pitch. Many parents were afraid to vaccinate their
babies. Authorities sought to reassure parents that vaccines are safe
and claimed that sudden unexplained infant deaths following vaccines
were merely coincidental.
In 1992, the American Academy of
Pediatrics (AAP) came up with a plan to reduce the unacceptable SIDS
rate while reassuring concerned moms and dads that sudden unexplained
infant deaths were not related to vaccines. The AAP initiated a national
'Back to Sleep' campaign, telling parents to place their infants
supine, rather than prone, during sleep.
From 1992 through 2001,
the post-neonatal SIDS rate dropped by an average annual rate of 8.6%.
It seemed as though the 'Back to Sleep' campaign was successful and that
the real cause of SIDS was due not to vaccinations but from babies
sleeping on their bellies. However, a closer inspection of the ICD --
the 130 official ways for an infant to die -- revealed a loophole.
Medical certifiers, such as coroners, could choose from among several
categories of death when a baby suddenly expired. They didn't have to
list the death as SIDS. Although the post-neonatal SIDS rate dropped by
an average annual rate of 8.6% from 1992 through 2001 following the
AAP's seemingly successful 'Back to Sleep' campaign, the post-neonatal
mortality rate from 'suffocation in bed' (ICD-9 code E913.0)
increased during this same period at an average annual rate of 11.2%.
Sudden,
unexplained infant deaths that were classified as SIDS prior to the
'Back to Sleep' campaign, were now being classified as deaths due to
suffocation in bed!The post-neonatal mortality rate from
'suffocation other' (ICD-9 code E913.1-E913.9), from 'unknown and
unspecified causes' (ICD-9 code 799.9), and from 'intent unknown' (ICD-9
code E980-E989), all increased during this period as well.[10] In
Australia, a similar subterfuge seemed to occur. Researchers observed
that when the SIDS rate decreased, deaths attributed to asphyxia
increased.[14-16]
From 1999 through 2001, the number of U.S.
deaths that were attributed to 'suffocation in bed' and 'unknown causes'
increased significantly. Although the post-neonatal SIDS rate continued
to decline,
there was no significant change in the total post-neonatal mortality rate. In a recent paper (Malloy and MacDorman) published in
Pediatrics, SIDS researchers made the following observation:
"If
death-certifier preference has shifted such that previously classified
SIDS deaths are now classified as 'suffocation,' the inclusion of these
suffocation deaths and unknown or unspecified deaths with SIDS deaths
then accounts for about 90 percent of the decline in the SIDS rate
observed between 1999 and 2001 and results in a non-significant decline
in SIDS."[10]
Other Evidence Linking SIDS to VaccinesAlthough
some studies were unable to find positive correlations between SIDS and
vaccines[17-19], there is other evidence that a subset of infants may
be more susceptible to SIDS shortly after being vaccinated. For example,
as early as 1933 the
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
published a paper by Madsen documenting the sudden deaths of two
infants soon after pertussis vaccination. The first child developed
cyanosis and convulsions 30 minutes after vaccination and died suddenly a
few minutes later. The second child developed cyanosis 2 hours after
vaccination and then died suddenly.[20]
In 1946, Werne and Garrow published a paper in
JAMA
documenting the sudden deaths of identical twins 24 hours after
pertussis vaccination. The babies had symptoms of shock throughout the
night prior to their fatal reactions.[21]
In the 1960s and 1970s
Aborigine infants began to mysteriously die at astonishing rates. In
some regions of Australia, 1 of every 2 babies succumbed to an
unexplained death -- a fatality rate of 50 percent! Kalokerinos solved
the riddle when he realized that the deaths were occurring shortly after
the babies were vaccinated. Health officials had recently initiated a
mass vaccination campaign to 'protect' Aborigine babies; their deaths
corresponded with the vaccination program. Kalokerinos realized that
these babies were severely malnourished, including a vitamin C
deficiency. Their undeveloped immune systems couldn't handle the
additional stress of vaccination. Kalokerinos was able to save other
babies from the same fate by administering small quantities of vitamin C
(100mg per month of age) prior to their vaccines.[22]
In Japan,
from 1970 through 1974, there were 37 documented sudden infant deaths
following pertussis vaccinations, inciting parents and doctors to reject
the shot. In 1975, Japanese authorities reacted to these events by
raising the age of vaccination from three months to two years. As a
result, the number of vaccine injury compensation claims that were paid
out for sudden deaths following vaccination dropped from 37 cases during
a 5-year period to just 3 cases during the next 6-and-a-half years
(from 1975 through August of 1981). The
sudden death
rate following vaccination dropped from 1.47 to 0.15 deaths per million
doses -- a 90% improvement.[23,24] In addition, from the early 1970s (a
period when 3-month-old infants were vaccinated) to the mid-1980s (ten
years after the age of vaccination was raised to 2 years) the Japanese
infant mortality rate (infant deaths per 1,000 live births) dramatically
declined from 12.4 to
5.0 -- a 60 percent drop![25]
According to a special task force (Cherry et al) that investigated the Japanese data and published their summary in
Pediatrics:
"The
category of 'sudden death' is instructive in that the entity
disappeared following both whole-cell and acellular vaccines when
immunization was delayed until a child was 24 months of age."[24]
Cherry et al also made the following observation:
"It
is clear that delaying the initial vaccination until a child is 24
months, regardless of the type of vaccine, reduces most of the
temporally associated severe adverse reactions."[24]
There is
other more recent evidence that delaying vaccinations until a later age
could save babies from severe vaccine-related adverse reactions,
including sudden deaths. For example,
Human and
Experimental Toxicology
published a study by Goldman and Miller that investigated more than
38,000 infant reports filed with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System (VAERS). (This federally mandated vaccine safety surveillance
program collects information about possible adverse reactions from
vaccines.) Cases that listed either 'hospitalization' or 'death' were
evaluated relative to
all infant reports, including those that
were non-serious. The hospitalization rate for infants that were
vaccinated shortly after birth was an astonishing 20.1% but decreased in
a statistically significant linear fashion to 10.7% for infants that
were vaccinated just prior to their first birthday. This study also
revealed a statistically significant lower mortality rate for infants
that were vaccinated between 6 months and 1 year of age when compared to
infants vaccinated between birth and 6 months of age.[26]
In
1982, William Torch, MD, director of Child Neurology, Department of
Pediatrics, University of Nevada School of Medicine, presented a study
at the 34th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics showing
that two-thirds of babies who had died from SIDS had been vaccinated
against DPT prior to death. Of these, 6.5% died within 12 hours of
vaccination; 13% within 24 hours; 26% within 3 days; and 37%, 61%, and
70% within 1, 2, and 3 weeks, respectively. Torch also found that
unvaccinated babies who died from SIDS did so most often in the fall or
winter while vaccinated babies died most often at 2 and 4 months -- the
same ages when initial doses of DPT were given to infants. He concluded
that:
"DPT may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden
infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may
outweigh its potential benefits. A need for re-evaluation and possible
modification of current vaccination procedures is indicated by this
study."[27]
In 1983,
Pediatric Infectious Diseases
published a study by Baraff et al that analyzed 17 infants that had been
vaccinated within 28 days prior to their sudden deaths, which were
classified as SIDS. They calculated the expected frequency of SIDS
deaths per day and compared that with the actual number of sudden deaths
in each of the 28 days after vaccination. A statistically significant
number of excess deaths happened in the first week following vaccination
(6.75 sudden deaths were expected and 17 actually occurred) -- a 250%
increase. The greatest number of excess deaths happened within 24 hours
after vaccination (0.96 sudden deaths were expected and 6 actually
occurred) -- a 625% increase over statistical expectations.[28]
In 1987, the
American Journal of Public Health
published a paper by Walker et al, once again confirming an apparent
link between vaccination and sudden deaths. Babies died at a rate more
than seven times greater than normal within 3 days after getting a DPT
vaccination.[29]
In 1991, Scheibner and Karlsson presented strong
evidence of an association between DPT injections and cot death (SIDS)
at the Second National Immunisation Conference in Canberra, Australia.
They were able to develop a sophisticated microprocessor that was placed
under infants' mattresses to precisely measure their breathing patterns
before and after vaccination. The microprocessor generated computer
printouts in integrals of a weighted apnea (cessation of breathing)
hypopnea (abnormally shallow breathing) density (WAHD). The data clearly
revealed that pertussis vaccination caused an inordinate increase in
episodes where breathing either nearly ceased or stopped
completely.[30-32] These episodes continued for months following DPT
vaccinations. The lead author of the paper concluded that "vaccination
is the single most prevalent and most preventable cause of infant
deaths."[31]
In 2006, Ottaviani et al published a paper in
Virchows Archiv
(European Journal of Pathology) documenting the case of a 3-month-old
infant who died suddenly and unexpectedly shortly after being given six
vaccines in a single injection. After dissecting the brainstem and
examining the cardiac conduction system, authors of the study made the
following observation: "This case offers a unique insight into the
possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a
vulnerable baby." They also noted that "any case of sudden unexpected
death occurring...in infancy, especially soon after a vaccination,
should always undergo a full necropsy study," otherwise a true
association between vaccination and death may escape detection.[33]
That same year, another team of scientists (Zinka et al) published a paper in
Vaccine
documenting six cases of SIDS that occurred within 48 hours following
the administration of a hexavalent vaccine. At postmortal examination,
these cases showed "unusual findings in the brain" that appeared
compatible with an association between hexavalent vaccination and sudden
infant death syndrome.[34]
In 2011,
Statistics in Medicine
published a paper by Kuhnert et al that examined an association between
multi-dose vaccinations and death. Authors of the paper demonstrated a
16-fold increase in sudden unexpected death after the fourth dose of a
pentavalent shot (five different vaccines in one injection) or
hexavalent shot (six different vaccines in one injection).[35]
Today,
unsuspecting parents continue to experience the heartbreak of losing
healthy children after vaccinations. Here is another unnecessary death
labeled as SIDS, as reported by a distraught mother:
"Our
beautiful 2-month-old daughter recently died. What was unusual was that
earlier on the day that she died, I had taken her to the military base
hospital for her two-month checkup. The doctor told me that she was just
perfect. Then he said that she needed four shots. I replied, 'Four!'?
She assured me that it was completely normal.
"That evening after
feeding our daughter, we laid her down to sleep. We checked on her 45
minutes later and discovered that she was dead. I told the police,
coroner, and investigators that I thought it was from the shots because
she was perfectly fine that day and before the shots. But after three
weeks we finally got an answer from the autopsy that it was SIDS. To
this day, I believe that her death was caused by the shots. No one can
convince me otherwise."[36]
More Vaccine Fatalities Hidden in the Death Tables'SIDS,'
'suffocation in bed,' and death due to 'unknown and unspecified
causes,' are just three of the 130 official cause-of-death categories
that might be concealing fatalities that were really caused by
vaccination. Several other ICD categories are possible candidates for
incorrect infant death classifications: unspecified viral diseases,
diseases of the blood, diseases of the nervous system, unspecified
diseases of the respiratory system, and shaken baby syndrome. All of
these official categories may be repositories of vaccine-related infant
deaths reclassified as common fatalities.
For example, a vaccine
against rotavirus-induced diarrhea (Rotarix) was licensed by the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008. However, in a clinical study that
evaluated the safety of this vaccine,
vaccinated babies died at a significantly higher rate than non-vaccinated babies
-- mainly due to a statistical increase in pneumonia fatalities.[37]
(One biologically plausible explanation is that natural rotavirus
infection might have a protective effect against respiratory
infection.)[38] Although these deaths appear to be vaccine related,
coroners are likely to misclassify them as pneumonia.
Some infant
fatalities that occur shortly after vaccinations are incorrectly
classified as shaken baby syndrome. Retinal and subdural bleeding can
result from an adult that shook the baby
or from vaccine damage.
Expert testimony by medical practitioners has exonerated innocent
parents of all charges against them.[39] This is just another example of
how the true cause of death can be reclassified or hidden within the
death tables.
The practice of reclassifying ICD data greatly
concerns the CDC "because inaccurate or inconsistent cause-of-death
determination and reporting hamper the ability to monitor national
trends, ascertain risk factors, and design and evaluate programs to
prevent these deaths."[40] Thus, medical certification practices need to
be monitored to determine how often vaccine-related infant deaths are
being reclassified as ordinary mortality in the ICD. More importantly,
parents need to be warned that vaccine safety is grossly overestimated
when vaccine-related deaths are not being accurately documented.
Vaccine Safety, Informed Consent and Human RightsThere are 130
official ways for an infant to die (as categorized in the ICD), and one
unofficial
way for an infant to die: following an adverse reaction to one or more
vaccines. When vaccine-related deaths are hidden within the death
tables, parents are denied the ability to ascertain honest vaccine
risk-to-benefit ratios and true informed consent to vaccinations is not
possible. When families are urged to vaccinate their children without
access to accurate data on vaccine-related deaths, their human rights
have been violated. Medical health authorities, pediatricians, and the
vaccine industry then become criminal accomplices to each infant death
caused by vaccines -- even when vaccines are not officially acknowledged
as the cause of death. Finding ways to increase vaccine safety,
providing families with true informed consent, and preserving human
rights, must be the top priorities.